Classical model of spin

Task number: 4384

If the electron were a classical solid sphere, with radius

\[ r_\mathrm{c} = \frac{e^\mathrm{2}}{4 \pi \varepsilon_\mathrm{0} mc^\mathrm{2}}  \dot =  2.81·10^{\mathrm{-15}}  \mathrm{m} \, . \]

(the so-called classical electron radius, obtained by assuming the electron’s mass is attributable to energy stored in its electric field, via the Einstein formula \(E=m{c^\mathrm{2}}\)), and its angular momentum is \(\frac{\hbar}{2}\), then how fast (in m s-1) would a point on the “equator” be moving? Does this model make sense? (Actually, the radius of the electron is known experimentally to be much less than \(r_\mathrm{c}\), but this only makes matters worse.

  • Necessary constants

    \(m\) = 9.11·10-34 kg electron’s mass
    \(\varepsilon_\mathrm{0}\) = 8.85·10-12 F m−1 vacuum permittivity
    \(\hbar\) = 1.055·10-34 J s-1 reduced Planck’s constant
    \(e\) = 1.6·10-19 C magnitude of the elementary charge
    \(c\) = 3·108 m s-1 speed of light in vacuum
  • Hint 1

    Find out how angular momentum is connected with a angular velocity, respectively with tangential speed of the point on the sphere’s equator.

  • Hint 2

    Remind yourself or find out how to determine the moment of inertia \(J\) for a sphere.

  • Solution

    We will use the relation between the angular momentum \(L\) and the angular velocity \(\omega\) \[ L = J \omega \, , \] where \(J\) is the moment of inertia and we can rewrite tangential velocity \(v = r_\mathrm{c} \, \omega\) as

    \[ v=r_\mathrm{c} \frac{L}{J} \, . \]

    We will substitute the moment of inertia for rigid sphere \(J = \frac{2}{5}mr_\mathrm{c}^2\) (see solution of hint 2 above) to the formula for peripheral velocity and simplify

    \[ v=r_\mathrm{c} \frac{\frac{\hbar}{2}}{\frac{2}{5}mr_\mathrm{c}^2}= \frac{5 \hbar}{4mr_\mathrm{c}} \, . \]

    We will substitute for radius \(r_c\) to the obtained formula, simplify it and calculate the value of the velocity

    \[ v= \frac{5 \hbar}{4m \frac{e^2}{4 \pi \varepsilon_\mathrm{0} m\mathrm{c}^2}} = \frac{5 \pi \varepsilon_\mathrm{0} \hbar c^2}{e^2} \dot=  5.15·10^{10} \mathrm{m s^{-1}} \, . \]
  • Answer

    The fastest point on the surface of the electron would be moving with velocity 5.15\(\cdot\)1010 m s-1.

    This is approximately hundred times bigger than the speed of light. Since we didn’t consider relativity in our calculations we cannot make any assumption when it comes to deciding if it is possible or not. When applying relativity with the same angular momentum we would get different angular velocity (as with momentum we would obtain two velocities with classical and relativity calculations). Still it gives us a hint that this model doesn’t look realistic.

  • Note – the derivation of the classical electron’s radius

    The classical electron’s radius can be derived with assumption that energy of its electrostatic field corresponds to its rest energy \(E = m {c}^2\).

    We assume the electron to be a small rigid ball with elementary charge \(e\) equally spread on its surface. We will determine the energy \(E_\mathrm{p}\) of its electrostatic field with following formula

    \[ E_\mathrm{p} = e \varphi \, , \]

    where \(\varphi\) is electric potential.

    Since we know where the charge is we will substitute phi with electric potential on the surface of homogenously charged sphere with radius \(r_\mathrm{c}\) that we know from the task Field of homogenously charged sphere. From there we know that it corresponds to the potential of point charge in the centre of the sphere. We get the energy of the electron’s electrostatic field

    \[ E_\mathrm{p} = e \frac{e}{4 \pi \varepsilon_\mathrm{0}} \, \frac{1}{r_\mathrm{c}} = \frac{e^2}{4 \pi \varepsilon_\mathrm{0}} \, \frac{1}{r_\mathrm{c}} \, . \]

    Now we will compare it with rest energy and derive the radius \(r_\mathrm{c}\)

    \[ E_\mathrm{p} = E \, , \] \[ \frac{e^2}{4 \pi \varepsilon_\mathrm{0}} \, \frac{1}{r_\mathrm{c}} = m {c}^2 \, , \] \[ r_\mathrm{c} = \frac{e^2}{4 \pi \varepsilon_0 m{c}^2} \, . \]

    We obtained the relation given in the task assignment.

Difficulty level: Level 3 – Advanced upper secondary level
Task with unusual solution
Tasks to identify relationships between facts
Original source: GRIFFITHS, David J. Introduction to Quantum Mechanics. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle
River: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2005
×Original source: GRIFFITHS, David J. Introduction to Quantum Mechanics. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2005
Cs translation
Send comment on task by email