SG experiment oriented at an arbitrary angle
Task number: 4409
Calculate the probabilities of measuring both spin‑\(\frac{1}{2}\) projections along a direction that is tilted in the \(xz\) plane by an angle \(\theta\) with respect to the \(z\)‑axis \((\varphi = 0)\), for the state \(|z+\rangle\), i.e., the state corresponding to the eigenstate with eigenvalue \(+ \frac{\hbar}{2}\) of the spin projection along the \(z\)‑axis.
Hint 1
Recall or look up the matrix form of the operator \(\hat S_\theta\) representing the spin‑\(\frac{1}{2}\) projection along an arbitrary direction in the \(xz\) plane. The direction is characterised by the angle \(\theta\), which specifies the deviation of this direction from the \(z\)‑axis and takes values from \(-π\) to \(π\).
Hint 2
Recall or look up how the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of matrices are determined.
Hint 3
Recall or look up how to decompose the state entering the measurement, and how the probabilities of obtaining the individual measurement outcomes can be determined from this decomposition.
Solution
Electrons with a spin projection along the \(z\)‑axis equal to \(+ \frac{\hbar}{2}\) enter the Stern–Gerlach apparatus. The eigenvector corresponding to this eigenvalue is \(\left |z+ \right \rangle = \begin{pmatrix} 1\\ 0 \end{pmatrix}\).
A beam of electrons in this state then passes through a magnet oriented at an angle \(\theta\). According to the measurement axiom, the state entering the measurement must first be expressed as a linear combination of the eigenstates of the measured observable.
Answer
The probabilities of measuring the spin‑\(\frac{1}{2}\) projections along the direction tilted by an angle \(\theta\) from the \(z\)‑axis \((\varphi = 0)\) in the state \(|z+\rangle\) are
\[ P_+ = \cos^2 \frac{\theta}{2} \, , \] \[ P_- = \sin^2 \frac{\theta}{2} \, . \]Comment – calculation of the second eigenvector
In this section, we focus on the eigenvector corresponding to the negative spin projection \(- \frac{\hbar}{2}\). The eigenvector \(\vec v\) associated with this eigenvalue \(\lambda\) is determined by substituting into the equation \(\left ( \hat S_\theta - \lambda \hat{\mathbb{E}} \right ) \cdot \vec v = \vec o\) and performing the following simplification
\[ \left ( \hat S_\theta - \lambda \hat{\mathbb{E}} \right ) \cdot \vec v = \left ( \frac{\hbar}{2} \begin{pmatrix} \cos \theta & \sin \theta \\ \sin \theta & − \cos \theta \end{pmatrix} + \frac{\hbar}{2} \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix} \right ) \begin{pmatrix} v_1 \\ v_2 \end{pmatrix} = \] \[ = \frac{\hbar}{2} \begin{pmatrix} \cos \theta + 1 & \sin \theta \\ \sin \theta & - \cos \theta + 1 \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} v_1 \\ v_2 \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \, . \]We divide this equality by the factor \(\frac{\hbar}{2}\) and expand it into its component equations. This yields a system of two linear equations with two unknowns
\[ \left ( \cos \theta + 1 \right ) v_1 + \sin \theta \, v_2 = 0 \, , \] \[ \sin \theta \, v_1 + \left ( 1 - \cos \theta \right ) v_2 = 0 \, . \]These equations are linearly dependent. From the second equation, we immediately see that one solution of the system is \(v_1 = \cos \theta - 1, v_2 = \sin \theta\). This determines the direction of the eigenvector corresponding to the eigenvalue \(- \frac{\hbar}{2}\). We now normalise it
\[ \frac{1}{\sqrt{|v_1|^2 + |v_2|^2}} \begin{pmatrix} v_1 \\ v_2 \end{pmatrix} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{\cos^2 \theta - 2 \cos \theta + 1 + \sin^2 \theta}} \begin{pmatrix} \cos \theta - 1 \\ \sin \theta \end{pmatrix} = \] \[ = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 - 2 \cos \theta}} \begin{pmatrix} \cos \theta - 1 \\ \sin \theta \end{pmatrix} \, . \]Using the double‑angle trigonometric identities, the above expression can be rewritten as
\[ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 - 2 \cos \theta}} \begin{pmatrix} \cos \theta - 1 \\ \sin \theta \end{pmatrix} = \] \[ = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \left (1 - \cos^2 \frac{\theta}{2} + \sin^2 \frac{\theta}{2} \right )}} \begin{pmatrix} \cos^2 \frac{\theta}{2} - \sin^2 \frac{\theta}{2} - \cos^2 \frac{\theta}{2} - \sin^2 \frac{\theta}{2} \\ 2 \sin \frac{\theta}{2} \cos \frac{\theta}{2} \end{pmatrix} = \] \[ = \frac{1}{\sqrt{4 \sin^2 \frac{\theta}{2}}} \begin{pmatrix} -2 \sin^2 \frac{\theta}{2} \\ 2 \sin \frac{\theta}{2} \cos \frac{\theta}{2} \end{pmatrix} \, . \]Taking the square root and dividing through, we obtain the normalised eigenvector in the form
\[ \frac{1}{\sqrt{4 \sin^2 \frac{\theta}{2}}} \begin{pmatrix} -2 \sin^2 \frac{\theta}{2} \\ 2 \sin \frac{\theta}{2} \cos \frac{\theta}{2} \end{pmatrix} = \frac{1}{2 \sin \frac{\theta}{2}} \begin{pmatrix} -2 \sin^2 \frac{\theta}{2} \\ 2 \sin \frac{\theta}{2} \cos \frac{\theta}{2} \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} - \sin \frac{\theta}{2} \\ \cos \frac{\theta}{2} \end{pmatrix} \, . \]Since this eigenvector corresponds to the eigenvalue \(- \frac{\hbar}{2}\), i.e., the negative spin projection along the direction characterised by the angle \(\theta\), we will denote this vector henceforth as
\[ |\theta - \rangle = \begin{pmatrix} - \sin \frac{\theta}{2} \\ \cos \frac{\theta}{2} \end{pmatrix} \, . \]Comment – calculation of the decomposition coefficients using the scalar product
The sought coefficients \(c_1, \, c_2\) of the decomposition
\[ |z+\rangle = c_1 |\theta +\rangle + c_2 |\theta -\rangle \]can be determined using the scalar product
\[ c_1 = \langle \theta + | \, z+ \rangle = \begin{pmatrix} \cos \frac{\theta}{2} & \sin \frac{\theta}{2} \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} 1 \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} = \cos \frac{\theta}{2} \, , \] \[ c_2 = \langle \theta - | \, z+ \rangle = \begin{pmatrix} - \sin \frac{\theta}{2} & \cos \frac{\theta}{2} \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} 1 \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} = - \sin \frac{\theta}{2} \, . \]Both methods—solving a system of two linear equations for two unknowns or using the scalar product—are correct and yield the same results.
Link
In the problem Spinový stav daný úhlem θ (Czech version only), the reverse situation is considered, i.e., the spin projection along the \(z\)‑axis is measured in the state \(|\theta +\rangle\) (it is not stated there, however, that this is an eigenstate of \(\hat S_{\theta}\)). Comparing the results, we see that the measurement probabilities are the same. This is because the denotations of the directions do not matter. Only the relative angle between the direction corresponding to the eigenstate with positive spin projection and the orientation of the Stern–Gerlach apparatus is relevant.


